Northern America vs Russian Federation: Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value US$, 2015 prices

Northern America
98,682 million USD
in 2024
Russian Federation
24,404 million USD
in 2024
Northern America rank
9th
Russian Federation rank
12th

Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value US$, 2015 prices over time

  • Northern America
  • Russian Federation
20.0k40.0k60.0k80.0k100.0k201020172024

How they compare

Northern America currently reports 98,682 million USD against 24,404 million USD in Russian Federation, a difference of 74,278 million USD.

That makes Northern America's figure about 4.0 times Russian Federation's.

Across all 15 years both countries report, Northern America has been ahead every year.

Northern America ranks 9th and Russian Federation ranks 12th of 29 groups.

Northern America has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Northern America Russian Federation Difference Ahead
2010s 89,515 million USD 25,764 million USD 63,751 million USD Northern America
2020s 90,184 million USD 26,940 million USD 63,244 million USD Northern America

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing — value us$, 2015 prices, Northern America or Russian Federation?
Northern America, at 98,682 million USD against 24,404 million USD in Russian Federation as of 2024.
What is the difference in credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing — value us$, 2015 prices between Northern America and Russian Federation?
74,278 million USD, with Northern America ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Northern America and Russian Federation?
15 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2024.
How do Northern America and Russian Federation rank globally for credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing — value us$, 2015 prices?
Northern America ranks 9th and Russian Federation ranks 12th of 29 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value US$, 2015 prices. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Northern America vs Russian Federation: Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value US$, 2015 prices. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/credit-to-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-2015-prices/northern-america/russian-federation-2/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/credit-to-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-2015-prices/northern-america/russian-federation-2/">Northern America vs Russian Federation: Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value US$, 2015 prices</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value US$, 2015 prices
Unit
million USD
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
162 places, 3,769 data points, 1991–2024
Last refreshed

Credit to agriculture measures the amount of loans and advances given by the banking sector to farmers, rural households, agricultural cooperatives, or any other agri-related businesses. Each country’s central bank compiles its credit stocks by economic activities as part of its monetary and financial statistics publications via annual or quarterly reports online. Data collection has been carried out mostly through reports found on the central bank websites. Data are collected and compiled according to the International Standard Industrial Classification of All Economic Activities (ISIC Rev. 4: https://unstats.un.org/unsd/classifications/Econ/isic) with a special concentration on the credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing sector separately from the ones to manufacturing and services.