Russian Federation vs Southern Europe: Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value US$, 2015 prices

Russian Federation
24,404 million USD
in 2024
Southern Europe
56,260 million USD
in 2024
Russian Federation rank
12th
Southern Europe rank
12th

Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value US$, 2015 prices over time

  • Russian Federation
  • Southern Europe
20.0k40.0k60.0k80.0k201020172024

How they compare

Southern Europe currently reports 56,260 million USD against 24,404 million USD in Russian Federation, a difference of 31,856 million USD.

That makes Southern Europe's figure about 2.3 times Russian Federation's.

Across all 15 years both countries report, Southern Europe has been ahead every year.

Russian Federation ranks 12th and Southern Europe ranks 12th of 119 countries.

Southern Europe has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Russian Federation Southern Europe Difference Ahead
2010s 25,764 million USD 73,596 million USD 47,832 million USD Southern Europe
2020s 26,940 million USD 63,419 million USD 36,479 million USD Southern Europe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing — value us$, 2015 prices, Russian Federation or Southern Europe?
Southern Europe, at 56,260 million USD against 24,404 million USD in Russian Federation as of 2024.
What is the difference in credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing — value us$, 2015 prices between Russian Federation and Southern Europe?
31,856 million USD, with Southern Europe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Russian Federation and Southern Europe?
15 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2024.
How do Russian Federation and Southern Europe rank globally for credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing — value us$, 2015 prices?
Russian Federation ranks 12th and Southern Europe ranks 12th of 119 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value US$, 2015 prices. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Russian Federation vs Southern Europe: Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value US$, 2015 prices. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/credit-to-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-2015-prices/russian-federation-2/southern-europe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/credit-to-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-2015-prices/russian-federation-2/southern-europe/">Russian Federation vs Southern Europe: Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value US$, 2015 prices</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value US$, 2015 prices
Unit
million USD
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
162 places, 3,769 data points, 1991–2024
Last refreshed

Credit to agriculture measures the amount of loans and advances given by the banking sector to farmers, rural households, agricultural cooperatives, or any other agri-related businesses. Each country’s central bank compiles its credit stocks by economic activities as part of its monetary and financial statistics publications via annual or quarterly reports online. Data collection has been carried out mostly through reports found on the central bank websites. Data are collected and compiled according to the International Standard Industrial Classification of All Economic Activities (ISIC Rev. 4: https://unstats.un.org/unsd/classifications/Econ/isic) with a special concentration on the credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing sector separately from the ones to manufacturing and services.