Australia and New Zealand vs Western Europe: Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value US$

Australia and New Zealand
122,652 million USD
in 2024
Western Europe
169,271 million USD
in 2024
Australia and New Zealand rank
3rd
Western Europe rank
6th

Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value US$ over time

  • Australia and New Zealand
  • Western Europe
050.0k100.0k150.0k201020172024

How they compare

Western Europe currently reports 169,271 million USD against 122,652 million USD in Australia and New Zealand, a difference of 46,619 million USD.

That makes Western Europe's figure about 1.4 times Australia and New Zealand's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Australia and New Zealand ahead.

Australia and New Zealand ranks 3rd and Western Europe ranks 6th of 119 countries.

Western Europe has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia and New Zealand Western Europe Difference Ahead
2010s 95,007 million USD 127,621 million USD 32,614 million USD Western Europe
2020s 112,715 million USD 158,104 million USD 45,389 million USD Western Europe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing — value us$, Australia and New Zealand or Western Europe?
Western Europe, at 169,271 million USD against 122,652 million USD in Australia and New Zealand as of 2024.
What is the difference in credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing — value us$ between Australia and New Zealand and Western Europe?
46,619 million USD, with Western Europe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Western Europe?
15 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2024.
How do Australia and New Zealand and Western Europe rank globally for credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing — value us$?
Australia and New Zealand ranks 3rd and Western Europe ranks 6th of 119 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value US$. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand vs Western Europe: Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value US$. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/credit-to-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us/australia-and-new-zealand/western-europe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/credit-to-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us/australia-and-new-zealand/western-europe/">Australia and New Zealand vs Western Europe: Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value US$</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value US$
Unit
million USD
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
162 places, 3,769 data points, 1991–2024
Last refreshed

Credit to agriculture measures the amount of loans and advances given by the banking sector to farmers, rural households, agricultural cooperatives, or any other agri-related businesses. Each country’s central bank compiles its credit stocks by economic activities as part of its monetary and financial statistics publications via annual or quarterly reports online. Data collection has been carried out mostly through reports found on the central bank websites. Data are collected and compiled according to the International Standard Industrial Classification of All Economic Activities (ISIC Rev. 4: https://unstats.un.org/unsd/classifications/Econ/isic) with a special concentration on the credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing sector separately from the ones to manufacturing and services.