Australia vs Australia and New Zealand: Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value US$

Australia
84,702 million USD
in 2024
Australia and New Zealand
122,652 million USD
in 2024
Australia rank
4th
Australia and New Zealand rank
3rd

Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value US$ over time

  • Australia
  • Australia and New Zealand
025.0k50.0k75.0k100.0k125.0k199320082024

How they compare

Australia and New Zealand currently reports 122,652 million USD against 84,702 million USD in Australia, a difference of 37,950 million USD.

That makes Australia and New Zealand's figure about 1.4 times Australia's.

Across all 15 years both countries report, Australia and New Zealand has been ahead every year.

Australia ranks 4th and Australia and New Zealand ranks 3rd of 119 countries.

Australia and New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Australia and New Zealand Difference Ahead
2010s 54,623 million USD 95,007 million USD 40,384 million USD Australia and New Zealand
2020s 72,731 million USD 112,715 million USD 39,984 million USD Australia and New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing — value us$, Australia or Australia and New Zealand?
Australia and New Zealand, at 122,652 million USD against 84,702 million USD in Australia as of 2024.
What is the difference in credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing — value us$ between Australia and Australia and New Zealand?
37,950 million USD, with Australia and New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Australia and New Zealand?
15 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2024.
How do Australia and Australia and New Zealand rank globally for credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing — value us$?
Australia ranks 4th and Australia and New Zealand ranks 3rd of 119 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value US$. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Australia and New Zealand: Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value US$. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/credit-to-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us/australia/australia-and-new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/credit-to-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us/australia/australia-and-new-zealand/">Australia vs Australia and New Zealand: Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value US$</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value US$
Unit
million USD
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
162 places, 3,769 data points, 1991–2024
Last refreshed

Credit to agriculture measures the amount of loans and advances given by the banking sector to farmers, rural households, agricultural cooperatives, or any other agri-related businesses. Each country’s central bank compiles its credit stocks by economic activities as part of its monetary and financial statistics publications via annual or quarterly reports online. Data collection has been carried out mostly through reports found on the central bank websites. Data are collected and compiled according to the International Standard Industrial Classification of All Economic Activities (ISIC Rev. 4: https://unstats.un.org/unsd/classifications/Econ/isic) with a special concentration on the credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing sector separately from the ones to manufacturing and services.