Australia vs Bolivia (Plurinational State of): Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value US$

Australia
84,702 million USD
in 2024
Bolivia (Plurinational State of)
2,350 million USD
in 2018
Australia rank
4th
Bolivia (Plurinational State of) rank
6th

Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value US$ over time

  • Australia
  • Bolivia (Plurinational State of)
020.0k40.0k60.0k80.0k199320082024

How they compare

Australia currently reports 84,702 million USD against 2,350 million USD in Bolivia (Plurinational State of), a difference of 82,352 million USD.

That makes Australia's figure about 36.0 times Bolivia (Plurinational State of)'s.

Across all 22 years both countries report, Australia has been ahead every year.

Australia ranks 4th and Bolivia (Plurinational State of) ranks 6th of 119 countries.

Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Bolivia (Plurinational State of) Difference Ahead
1990s 12,667 million USD 497.13 million USD 12,170 million USD Australia
2000s 28,620 million USD 324.4 million USD 28,296 million USD Australia
2010s 54,676 million USD 1,122 million USD 53,553 million USD Australia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing — value us$, Australia or Bolivia (Plurinational State of)?
Australia, at 84,702 million USD against 2,350 million USD in Bolivia (Plurinational State of) as of 2024.
What is the difference in credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing — value us$ between Australia and Bolivia (Plurinational State of)?
82,352 million USD, with Australia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Bolivia (Plurinational State of)?
22 years are reported by both, from 1997 to 2018.
How do Australia and Bolivia (Plurinational State of) rank globally for credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing — value us$?
Australia ranks 4th and Bolivia (Plurinational State of) ranks 6th of 119 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value US$. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Bolivia (Plurinational State of): Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value US$. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/credit-to-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us/australia/bolivia-plurinational-state-of/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/credit-to-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us/australia/bolivia-plurinational-state-of/">Australia vs Bolivia (Plurinational State of): Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value US$</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value US$
Unit
million USD
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
162 places, 3,769 data points, 1991–2024
Last refreshed

Credit to agriculture measures the amount of loans and advances given by the banking sector to farmers, rural households, agricultural cooperatives, or any other agri-related businesses. Each country’s central bank compiles its credit stocks by economic activities as part of its monetary and financial statistics publications via annual or quarterly reports online. Data collection has been carried out mostly through reports found on the central bank websites. Data are collected and compiled according to the International Standard Industrial Classification of All Economic Activities (ISIC Rev. 4: https://unstats.un.org/unsd/classifications/Econ/isic) with a special concentration on the credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing sector separately from the ones to manufacturing and services.