Australia vs United Republic of Tanzania: Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value US$

Australia
84,702 million USD
in 2024
United Republic of Tanzania
1,372 million USD
in 2023
Australia rank
4th
United Republic of Tanzania rank
7th

Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value US$ over time

  • Australia
  • United Republic of Tanzania
020.0k40.0k60.0k80.0k199320082024

How they compare

Australia currently reports 84,702 million USD against 1,372 million USD in United Republic of Tanzania, a difference of 83,330 million USD.

That makes Australia's figure about 61.7 times United Republic of Tanzania's.

Across all 31 years both countries report, Australia has been ahead every year.

Australia ranks 4th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 7th of 119 countries.

Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia United Republic of Tanzania Difference Ahead
1990s 11,505 million USD 33.34 million USD 11,471 million USD Australia
2000s 28,620 million USD 188.21 million USD 28,432 million USD Australia
2010s 54,623 million USD 611.93 million USD 54,011 million USD Australia
2020s 69,739 million USD 971.04 million USD 68,768 million USD Australia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing — value us$, Australia or United Republic of Tanzania?
Australia, at 84,702 million USD against 1,372 million USD in United Republic of Tanzania as of 2024.
What is the difference in credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing — value us$ between Australia and United Republic of Tanzania?
83,330 million USD, with Australia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and United Republic of Tanzania?
31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
How do Australia and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing — value us$?
Australia ranks 4th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 7th of 119 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value US$. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs United Republic of Tanzania: Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value US$. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/credit-to-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us/australia/united-republic-of-tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/credit-to-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us/australia/united-republic-of-tanzania/">Australia vs United Republic of Tanzania: Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value US$</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value US$
Unit
million USD
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
162 places, 3,769 data points, 1991–2024
Last refreshed

Credit to agriculture measures the amount of loans and advances given by the banking sector to farmers, rural households, agricultural cooperatives, or any other agri-related businesses. Each country’s central bank compiles its credit stocks by economic activities as part of its monetary and financial statistics publications via annual or quarterly reports online. Data collection has been carried out mostly through reports found on the central bank websites. Data are collected and compiled according to the International Standard Industrial Classification of All Economic Activities (ISIC Rev. 4: https://unstats.un.org/unsd/classifications/Econ/isic) with a special concentration on the credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing sector separately from the ones to manufacturing and services.