Bolivia (Plurinational State of) vs Canada: Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value US$

Bolivia (Plurinational State of)
2,350 million USD
in 2018
Canada
41,752 million USD
in 2024
Bolivia (Plurinational State of) rank
6th
Canada rank
8th

Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value US$ over time

  • Bolivia (Plurinational State of)
  • Canada
010.0k20.0k30.0k40.0k199120072024

How they compare

Canada currently reports 41,752 million USD against 2,350 million USD in Bolivia (Plurinational State of), a difference of 39,402 million USD.

That makes Canada's figure about 17.8 times Bolivia (Plurinational State of)'s.

Across all 22 years both countries report, Canada has been ahead every year.

Bolivia (Plurinational State of) ranks 6th and Canada ranks 8th of 14 countries.

Canada has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bolivia (Plurinational State of) Canada Difference Ahead
1990s 497.13 million USD 9,478 million USD 8,981 million USD Canada
2000s 324.4 million USD 12,828 million USD 12,503 million USD Canada
2010s 1,122 million USD 18,798 million USD 17,676 million USD Canada

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing — value us$, Bolivia (Plurinational State of) or Canada?
Canada, at 41,752 million USD against 2,350 million USD in Bolivia (Plurinational State of) as of 2024.
What is the difference in credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing — value us$ between Bolivia (Plurinational State of) and Canada?
39,402 million USD, with Canada ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bolivia (Plurinational State of) and Canada?
22 years are reported by both, from 1997 to 2018.
How do Bolivia (Plurinational State of) and Canada rank globally for credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing — value us$?
Bolivia (Plurinational State of) ranks 6th and Canada ranks 8th of 14 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value US$. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bolivia (Plurinational State of) vs Canada: Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value US$. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/credit-to-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us/bolivia-plurinational-state-of/canada/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/credit-to-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us/bolivia-plurinational-state-of/canada/">Bolivia (Plurinational State of) vs Canada: Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value US$</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value US$
Unit
million USD
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
162 places, 3,769 data points, 1991–2024
Last refreshed

Credit to agriculture measures the amount of loans and advances given by the banking sector to farmers, rural households, agricultural cooperatives, or any other agri-related businesses. Each country’s central bank compiles its credit stocks by economic activities as part of its monetary and financial statistics publications via annual or quarterly reports online. Data collection has been carried out mostly through reports found on the central bank websites. Data are collected and compiled according to the International Standard Industrial Classification of All Economic Activities (ISIC Rev. 4: https://unstats.un.org/unsd/classifications/Econ/isic) with a special concentration on the credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing sector separately from the ones to manufacturing and services.