Finland vs Panama: Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value US$
Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value US$ over time
- Finland
- Panama
How they compare
Finland currently reports 2,276 million USD against 2,046 million USD in Panama, a difference of 230 million USD.
That makes Finland's figure about 1.1 times Panama's.
Across all 13 years both countries report, Finland has been ahead every year.
Finland ranks 37th and Panama ranks 40th of 119 countries.
Finland has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Finland | Panama | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 1,867 million USD | 1,470 million USD | 396.6 million USD | Finland |
| 2020s | 2,268 million USD | 1,894 million USD | 374.72 million USD | Finland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing — value us$, Finland or Panama?
- Finland, at 2,276 million USD against 2,046 million USD in Panama as of 2022.
- What is the difference in credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing — value us$ between Finland and Panama?
- 230 million USD, with Finland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Panama?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2022.
- How do Finland and Panama rank globally for credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing — value us$?
- Finland ranks 37th and Panama ranks 40th of 119 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value US$. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Credit to agriculture measures the amount of loans and advances given by the banking sector to farmers, rural households, agricultural cooperatives, or any other agri-related businesses. Each country’s central bank compiles its credit stocks by economic activities as part of its monetary and financial statistics publications via annual or quarterly reports online. Data collection has been carried out mostly through reports found on the central bank websites. Data are collected and compiled according to the International Standard Industrial Classification of All Economic Activities (ISIC Rev. 4: https://unstats.un.org/unsd/classifications/Econ/isic) with a special concentration on the credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing sector separately from the ones to manufacturing and services.