Italy vs United States of America: Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value US$

Italy
41,377 million USD
in 2024
United States of America
83,024 million USD
in 2024
Italy rank
9th
United States of America rank
11th

Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value US$ over time

  • Italy
  • United States of America
20.0k40.0k60.0k80.0k199120072024

How they compare

United States of America currently reports 83,024 million USD against 41,377 million USD in Italy, a difference of 41,647 million USD.

That makes United States of America's figure about 2.0 times Italy's.

Across all 24 years both countries report, United States of America has been ahead every year.

Italy ranks 9th and United States of America ranks 11th of 119 countries.

United States of America has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Italy United States of America Difference Ahead
2000s 37,103 million USD 52,019 million USD 14,915 million USD United States of America
2010s 52,950 million USD 71,515 million USD 18,565 million USD United States of America
2020s 44,097 million USD 75,060 million USD 30,963 million USD United States of America

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing — value us$, Italy or United States of America?
United States of America, at 83,024 million USD against 41,377 million USD in Italy as of 2024.
What is the difference in credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing — value us$ between Italy and United States of America?
41,647 million USD, with United States of America ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Italy and United States of America?
24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
How do Italy and United States of America rank globally for credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing — value us$?
Italy ranks 9th and United States of America ranks 11th of 119 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value US$. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Italy vs United States of America: Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value US$. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/credit-to-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us/italy/united-states-of-america/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/credit-to-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us/italy/united-states-of-america/">Italy vs United States of America: Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value US$</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value US$
Unit
million USD
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
162 places, 3,769 data points, 1991–2024
Last refreshed

Credit to agriculture measures the amount of loans and advances given by the banking sector to farmers, rural households, agricultural cooperatives, or any other agri-related businesses. Each country’s central bank compiles its credit stocks by economic activities as part of its monetary and financial statistics publications via annual or quarterly reports online. Data collection has been carried out mostly through reports found on the central bank websites. Data are collected and compiled according to the International Standard Industrial Classification of All Economic Activities (ISIC Rev. 4: https://unstats.un.org/unsd/classifications/Econ/isic) with a special concentration on the credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing sector separately from the ones to manufacturing and services.