Republic of Korea vs Republic of Moldova: Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value US$

Republic of Korea
56,311 million USD
in 2024
Republic of Moldova
287.32 million USD
in 2024
Republic of Korea rank
7th
Republic of Moldova rank
9th

Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value US$ over time

  • Republic of Korea
  • Republic of Moldova
020.0k40.0k60.0k199820112024

How they compare

Republic of Korea currently reports 56,311 million USD against 287.32 million USD in Republic of Moldova, a difference of 56,024 million USD.

That makes Republic of Korea's figure about 196.0 times Republic of Moldova's.

Across all 17 years both countries report, Republic of Korea has been ahead every year.

Republic of Korea ranks 7th and Republic of Moldova ranks 9th of 119 countries.

Republic of Korea has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Republic of Korea Republic of Moldova Difference Ahead
2000s 40,401 million USD 262.86 million USD 40,138 million USD Republic of Korea
2010s 34,437 million USD 194.52 million USD 34,243 million USD Republic of Korea
2020s 48,870 million USD 246.73 million USD 48,623 million USD Republic of Korea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing — value us$, Republic of Korea or Republic of Moldova?
Republic of Korea, at 56,311 million USD against 287.32 million USD in Republic of Moldova as of 2024.
What is the difference in credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing — value us$ between Republic of Korea and Republic of Moldova?
56,024 million USD, with Republic of Korea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Republic of Korea and Republic of Moldova?
17 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2024.
How do Republic of Korea and Republic of Moldova rank globally for credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing — value us$?
Republic of Korea ranks 7th and Republic of Moldova ranks 9th of 119 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value US$. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Republic of Korea vs Republic of Moldova: Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value US$. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/credit-to-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us/republic-of-korea/republic-of-moldova/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/credit-to-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us/republic-of-korea/republic-of-moldova/">Republic of Korea vs Republic of Moldova: Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value US$</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value US$
Unit
million USD
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
162 places, 3,769 data points, 1991–2024
Last refreshed

Credit to agriculture measures the amount of loans and advances given by the banking sector to farmers, rural households, agricultural cooperatives, or any other agri-related businesses. Each country’s central bank compiles its credit stocks by economic activities as part of its monetary and financial statistics publications via annual or quarterly reports online. Data collection has been carried out mostly through reports found on the central bank websites. Data are collected and compiled according to the International Standard Industrial Classification of All Economic Activities (ISIC Rev. 4: https://unstats.un.org/unsd/classifications/Econ/isic) with a special concentration on the credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing sector separately from the ones to manufacturing and services.