Republic of Korea vs South-eastern Asia: Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value US$

Republic of Korea
56,311 million USD
in 2024
South-eastern Asia
97,174 million USD
in 2024
Republic of Korea rank
7th
South-eastern Asia rank
10th

Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value US$ over time

  • Republic of Korea
  • South-eastern Asia
20.0k40.0k60.0k80.0k100.0k200820162024

How they compare

South-eastern Asia currently reports 97,174 million USD against 56,311 million USD in Republic of Korea, a difference of 40,863 million USD.

That makes South-eastern Asia's figure about 1.7 times Republic of Korea's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Republic of Korea ahead.

Republic of Korea ranks 7th and South-eastern Asia ranks 10th of 119 countries.

South-eastern Asia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Republic of Korea South-eastern Asia Difference Ahead
2010s 34,437 million USD 58,687 million USD 24,250 million USD South-eastern Asia
2020s 48,870 million USD 90,814 million USD 41,944 million USD South-eastern Asia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing — value us$, Republic of Korea or South-eastern Asia?
South-eastern Asia, at 97,174 million USD against 56,311 million USD in Republic of Korea as of 2024.
What is the difference in credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing — value us$ between Republic of Korea and South-eastern Asia?
40,863 million USD, with South-eastern Asia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Republic of Korea and South-eastern Asia?
15 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2024.
How do Republic of Korea and South-eastern Asia rank globally for credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing — value us$?
Republic of Korea ranks 7th and South-eastern Asia ranks 10th of 119 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value US$. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Republic of Korea vs South-eastern Asia: Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value US$. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/credit-to-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us/republic-of-korea/south-eastern-asia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/credit-to-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us/republic-of-korea/south-eastern-asia/">Republic of Korea vs South-eastern Asia: Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value US$</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value US$
Unit
million USD
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
162 places, 3,769 data points, 1991–2024
Last refreshed

Credit to agriculture measures the amount of loans and advances given by the banking sector to farmers, rural households, agricultural cooperatives, or any other agri-related businesses. Each country’s central bank compiles its credit stocks by economic activities as part of its monetary and financial statistics publications via annual or quarterly reports online. Data collection has been carried out mostly through reports found on the central bank websites. Data are collected and compiled according to the International Standard Industrial Classification of All Economic Activities (ISIC Rev. 4: https://unstats.un.org/unsd/classifications/Econ/isic) with a special concentration on the credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing sector separately from the ones to manufacturing and services.