Ethiopia vs Jamaica: Crop harvest removal — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Crop harvest removal — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Ethiopia
- Jamaica
How they compare
Jamaica currently reports 38 kg/ha against 36.33 kg/ha in Ethiopia, a difference of 1.67 kg/ha.
Across all 31 years both countries report, Jamaica has been ahead every year.
Ethiopia ranks 103rd and Jamaica ranks 101st of 186 countries.
Jamaica has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ethiopia | Jamaica | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 16.06 kg/ha | 61.56 kg/ha | 45.5 kg/ha | Jamaica |
| 2000s | 20.92 kg/ha | 59.61 kg/ha | 38.69 kg/ha | Jamaica |
| 2010s | 32.05 kg/ha | 52.42 kg/ha | 20.37 kg/ha | Jamaica |
| 2020s | 35.44 kg/ha | 40.72 kg/ha | 5.28 kg/ha | Jamaica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop harvest removal — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Ethiopia or Jamaica?
- Jamaica, at 38 kg/ha against 36.33 kg/ha in Ethiopia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop harvest removal — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Ethiopia and Jamaica?
- 1.67 kg/ha, with Jamaica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ethiopia and Jamaica?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Ethiopia and Jamaica rank globally for crop harvest removal — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Ethiopia ranks 103rd and Jamaica ranks 101st of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop harvest removal — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).