Fiji vs Japan: Crop harvest removal — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Crop harvest removal — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Fiji
- Japan
How they compare
Fiji currently reports 58.53 kg/ha against 57.13 kg/ha in Japan, a difference of 1.4 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Japan ahead.
Fiji ranks 56th and Japan ranks 58th of 185 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Fiji averaged higher in 5 and Japan in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Fiji | Japan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 86.15 kg/ha | 69.43 kg/ha | 16.71 kg/ha | Fiji |
| 1970s | 89.13 kg/ha | 60.39 kg/ha | 28.75 kg/ha | Fiji |
| 1980s | 86.7 kg/ha | 59.7 kg/ha | 27.01 kg/ha | Fiji |
| 1990s | 74.51 kg/ha | 57.32 kg/ha | 17.19 kg/ha | Fiji |
| 2000s | 82.9 kg/ha | 56.84 kg/ha | 26.06 kg/ha | Fiji |
| 2010s | 54.5 kg/ha | 56.44 kg/ha | 1.95 kg/ha | Japan |
| 2020s | 56.7 kg/ha | 57.54 kg/ha | 0.8359 kg/ha | Japan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop harvest removal — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Fiji or Japan?
- Fiji, at 58.53 kg/ha against 57.13 kg/ha in Japan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop harvest removal — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Fiji and Japan?
- 1.4 kg/ha, with Fiji ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Fiji and Japan?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Fiji and Japan rank globally for crop harvest removal — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Fiji ranks 56th and Japan ranks 58th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop harvest removal — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).