Georgia vs Zimbabwe: Crop harvest removal — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Crop harvest removal — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Georgia
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Georgia currently reports 22.54 kg/ha against 22.1 kg/ha in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.44 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Georgia ahead.
Georgia ranks 135th and Zimbabwe ranks 138th of 185 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Georgia averaged higher in 2 and Zimbabwe in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Georgia | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 13.97 kg/ha | 21.11 kg/ha | 7.14 kg/ha | Zimbabwe |
| 2000s | 18.02 kg/ha | 18.05 kg/ha | 0.0386 kg/ha | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 18.68 kg/ha | 15.48 kg/ha | 3.2 kg/ha | Georgia |
| 2020s | 22.98 kg/ha | 21.64 kg/ha | 1.34 kg/ha | Georgia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop harvest removal — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Georgia or Zimbabwe?
- Georgia, at 22.54 kg/ha against 22.1 kg/ha in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop harvest removal — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Georgia and Zimbabwe?
- 0.44 kg/ha, with Georgia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Zimbabwe?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Georgia and Zimbabwe rank globally for crop harvest removal — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Georgia ranks 135th and Zimbabwe ranks 138th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop harvest removal — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).