Kenya vs Russian Federation: Crop harvest removal — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Crop harvest removal — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Kenya
- Russian Federation
How they compare
Russian Federation currently reports 32.62 kg/ha against 32.02 kg/ha in Kenya, a difference of 0.6 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Kenya ahead.
Kenya ranks 115th and Russian Federation ranks 114th of 186 countries.
Kenya has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kenya | Russian Federation | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 22.06 kg/ha | 14.2 kg/ha | 7.87 kg/ha | Kenya |
| 2000s | 25.23 kg/ha | 16.26 kg/ha | 8.97 kg/ha | Kenya |
| 2010s | 28.76 kg/ha | 21.84 kg/ha | 6.93 kg/ha | Kenya |
| 2020s | 30.94 kg/ha | 30.92 kg/ha | 0.018 kg/ha | Kenya |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop harvest removal — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Kenya or Russian Federation?
- Russian Federation, at 32.62 kg/ha against 32.02 kg/ha in Kenya as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop harvest removal — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Kenya and Russian Federation?
- 0.6 kg/ha, with Russian Federation ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kenya and Russian Federation?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Kenya and Russian Federation rank globally for crop harvest removal — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Kenya ranks 115th and Russian Federation ranks 114th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop harvest removal — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).