Kyrgyzstan vs Peru: Crop harvest removal — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Crop harvest removal — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Kyrgyzstan
- Peru
How they compare
Peru currently reports 33.95 kg/ha against 33.73 kg/ha in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 0.22 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 11 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Kyrgyzstan ahead.
Kyrgyzstan ranks 112th and Peru ranks 111th of 186 countries.
Kyrgyzstan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kyrgyzstan | Peru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 25.68 kg/ha | 21.45 kg/ha | 4.24 kg/ha | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2000s | 33.99 kg/ha | 30.66 kg/ha | 3.33 kg/ha | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2010s | 34.4 kg/ha | 34.34 kg/ha | 0.06 kg/ha | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2020s | 34.91 kg/ha | 33.09 kg/ha | 1.82 kg/ha | Kyrgyzstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop harvest removal — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Kyrgyzstan or Peru?
- Peru, at 33.95 kg/ha against 33.73 kg/ha in Kyrgyzstan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop harvest removal — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Kyrgyzstan and Peru?
- 0.22 kg/ha, with Peru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Peru?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Kyrgyzstan and Peru rank globally for crop harvest removal — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 112th and Peru ranks 111th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop harvest removal — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).