Latvia vs Malaysia: Crop harvest removal — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Crop harvest removal — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Latvia
- Malaysia
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 52.75 kg/ha against 52.21 kg/ha in Malaysia, a difference of 0.54 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Malaysia ahead.
Latvia ranks 69th and Malaysia ranks 70th of 186 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 1 and Malaysia in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Malaysia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 18.84 kg/ha | 35.64 kg/ha | 16.8 kg/ha | Malaysia |
| 2000s | 28.75 kg/ha | 50.37 kg/ha | 21.62 kg/ha | Malaysia |
| 2010s | 47.62 kg/ha | 54.79 kg/ha | 7.17 kg/ha | Malaysia |
| 2020s | 59.7 kg/ha | 52.36 kg/ha | 7.34 kg/ha | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop harvest removal — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Latvia or Malaysia?
- Latvia, at 52.75 kg/ha against 52.21 kg/ha in Malaysia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop harvest removal — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Latvia and Malaysia?
- 0.54 kg/ha, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Malaysia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Latvia and Malaysia rank globally for crop harvest removal — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Latvia ranks 69th and Malaysia ranks 70th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop harvest removal — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).