Armenia, Republic of vs Georgia: Crop harvest removal — Cropland nitrogen
Crop harvest removal — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Armenia, Republic of
- Georgia
How they compare
Armenia, Republic of currently reports 10,822 t against 9,737 t in Georgia, a difference of 1,085 t.
That makes Armenia, Republic of's figure about 1.1 times Georgia's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Georgia ahead.
Armenia, Republic of ranks 129th and Georgia ranks 132nd of 185 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Armenia, Republic of averaged higher in 1 and Georgia in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia, Republic of | Georgia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 8,798 t | 15,147 t | 6,349 t | Georgia |
| 2000s | 11,762 t | 13,115 t | 1,353 t | Georgia |
| 2010s | 14,916 t | 8,894 t | 6,022 t | Armenia, Republic of |
| 2020s | 9,660 t | 10,077 t | 416.73 t | Georgia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop harvest removal — cropland nitrogen, Armenia, Republic of or Georgia?
- Armenia, Republic of, at 10,822 t against 9,737 t in Georgia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop harvest removal — cropland nitrogen between Armenia, Republic of and Georgia?
- 1,085 t, with Armenia, Republic of ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia, Republic of and Georgia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Armenia, Republic of and Georgia rank globally for crop harvest removal — cropland nitrogen?
- Armenia, Republic of ranks 129th and Georgia ranks 132nd of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop harvest removal — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).