Austria vs Madagascar: Crop harvest removal — Cropland nitrogen
Crop harvest removal — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Austria
- Madagascar
How they compare
Austria currently reports 120,114 t against 109,529 t in Madagascar, a difference of 10,585 t.
That makes Austria's figure about 1.1 times Madagascar's.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Austria has been ahead every year.
Austria ranks 73rd and Madagascar ranks 76th of 186 countries.
Austria has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Austria | Madagascar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 68,662 t | 39,016 t | 29,646 t | Austria |
| 1970s | 85,003 t | 48,046 t | 36,957 t | Austria |
| 1980s | 105,516 t | 55,048 t | 50,468 t | Austria |
| 1990s | 108,730 t | 63,610 t | 45,120 t | Austria |
| 2000s | 107,518 t | 78,492 t | 29,026 t | Austria |
| 2010s | 114,344 t | 94,734 t | 19,610 t | Austria |
| 2020s | 120,012 t | 103,312 t | 16,700 t | Austria |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop harvest removal — cropland nitrogen, Austria or Madagascar?
- Austria, at 120,114 t against 109,529 t in Madagascar as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop harvest removal — cropland nitrogen between Austria and Madagascar?
- 10,585 t, with Austria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Madagascar?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Austria and Madagascar rank globally for crop harvest removal — cropland nitrogen?
- Austria ranks 73rd and Madagascar ranks 76th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop harvest removal — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).