Azerbaijan vs Zimbabwe: Crop harvest removal — Cropland nitrogen
Crop harvest removal — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Azerbaijan
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Azerbaijan currently reports 89,954 t against 89,864 t in Zimbabwe, a difference of 90 t.
The two have swapped places 12 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Azerbaijan ahead.
Azerbaijan ranks 80th and Zimbabwe ranks 81st of 185 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Azerbaijan averaged higher in 2 and Zimbabwe in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Azerbaijan | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 39,134 t | 68,236 t | 29,103 t | Zimbabwe |
| 2000s | 56,302 t | 70,535 t | 14,233 t | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 70,830 t | 63,330 t | 7,500 t | Azerbaijan |
| 2020s | 91,481 t | 88,124 t | 3,357 t | Azerbaijan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop harvest removal — cropland nitrogen, Azerbaijan or Zimbabwe?
- Azerbaijan, at 89,954 t against 89,864 t in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop harvest removal — cropland nitrogen between Azerbaijan and Zimbabwe?
- 90 t, with Azerbaijan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Azerbaijan and Zimbabwe?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Azerbaijan and Zimbabwe rank globally for crop harvest removal — cropland nitrogen?
- Azerbaijan ranks 80th and Zimbabwe ranks 81st of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop harvest removal — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).