Belize vs Mauritius: Crop harvest removal — Cropland nitrogen
Crop harvest removal — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Belize
- Mauritius
How they compare
Belize currently reports 9,739 t against 9,637 t in Mauritius, a difference of 102 t.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Mauritius ahead.
Belize ranks 143rd and Mauritius ranks 145th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Belize averaged higher in 1 and Mauritius in 6.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belize | Mauritius | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1,712 t | 19,759 t | 18,046 t | Mauritius |
| 1970s | 3,494 t | 21,786 t | 18,291 t | Mauritius |
| 1980s | 4,294 t | 20,882 t | 16,588 t | Mauritius |
| 1990s | 5,719 t | 20,249 t | 14,530 t | Mauritius |
| 2000s | 7,728 t | 18,674 t | 10,946 t | Mauritius |
| 2010s | 8,709 t | 14,635 t | 5,926 t | Mauritius |
| 2020s | 10,080 t | 9,678 t | 401.53 t | Belize |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop harvest removal — cropland nitrogen, Belize or Mauritius?
- Belize, at 9,739 t against 9,637 t in Mauritius as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop harvest removal — cropland nitrogen between Belize and Mauritius?
- 102 t, with Belize ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belize and Mauritius?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Belize and Mauritius rank globally for crop harvest removal — cropland nitrogen?
- Belize ranks 143rd and Mauritius ranks 145th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop harvest removal — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).