Botswana vs Comoros: Crop harvest removal — Cropland nitrogen
Crop harvest removal — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Botswana
- Comoros
How they compare
Comoros currently reports 2,562 t against 2,355 t in Botswana, a difference of 207 t.
That makes Comoros's figure about 1.1 times Botswana's.
The two have swapped places 21 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Botswana ahead.
Botswana ranks 164th and Comoros ranks 163rd of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Botswana averaged higher in 3 and Comoros in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Botswana | Comoros | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1,306 t | 1,349 t | 43.29 t | Comoros |
| 1970s | 1,858 t | 1,440 t | 418.61 t | Botswana |
| 1980s | 1,536 t | 1,384 t | 151.84 t | Botswana |
| 1990s | 1,370 t | 1,706 t | 335.47 t | Comoros |
| 2000s | 1,374 t | 1,746 t | 371.73 t | Comoros |
| 2010s | 1,689 t | 2,489 t | 799.53 t | Comoros |
| 2020s | 3,050 t | 2,640 t | 410.65 t | Botswana |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop harvest removal — cropland nitrogen, Botswana or Comoros?
- Comoros, at 2,562 t against 2,355 t in Botswana as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop harvest removal — cropland nitrogen between Botswana and Comoros?
- 207 t, with Comoros ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Comoros?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Botswana and Comoros rank globally for crop harvest removal — cropland nitrogen?
- Botswana ranks 164th and Comoros ranks 163rd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop harvest removal — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).