Burkina Faso vs Peru: Crop harvest removal — Cropland nitrogen
Crop harvest removal — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Burkina Faso
- Peru
How they compare
Peru currently reports 210,456 t against 200,904 t in Burkina Faso, a difference of 9,552 t.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Peru has been ahead every year.
Burkina Faso ranks 54th and Peru ranks 51st of 186 countries.
Peru has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Burkina Faso | Peru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 24,553 t | 88,112 t | 63,560 t | Peru |
| 1970s | 28,834 t | 93,107 t | 64,273 t | Peru |
| 1980s | 44,999 t | 94,663 t | 49,663 t | Peru |
| 1990s | 71,575 t | 104,399 t | 32,824 t | Peru |
| 2000s | 114,507 t | 158,534 t | 44,027 t | Peru |
| 2010s | 162,589 t | 189,995 t | 27,406 t | Peru |
| 2020s | 192,066 t | 209,133 t | 17,067 t | Peru |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop harvest removal — cropland nitrogen, Burkina Faso or Peru?
- Peru, at 210,456 t against 200,904 t in Burkina Faso as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop harvest removal — cropland nitrogen between Burkina Faso and Peru?
- 9,552 t, with Peru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Peru?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Burkina Faso and Peru rank globally for crop harvest removal — cropland nitrogen?
- Burkina Faso ranks 54th and Peru ranks 51st of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop harvest removal — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).