Cambodia vs Czechia: Crop harvest removal β Cropland nitrogen
Crop harvest removal β Cropland nitrogen over time
- Cambodia
- Czechia
How they compare
Cambodia currently reports 235,659 t against 218,617 t in Czechia, a difference of 17,042 t.
That makes Cambodia's figure about 1.1 times Czechia's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Czechia ahead.
Cambodia ranks 45th and Czechia ranks 48th of 185 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Cambodia averaged higher in 1 and Czechia in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cambodia | Czechia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 50,059 t | 174,278 t | 124,219 t | Czechia |
| 2000s | 90,976 t | 185,916 t | 94,940 t | Czechia |
| 2010s | 178,110 t | 205,703 t | 27,593 t | Czechia |
| 2020s | 217,436 t | 215,624 t | 1,812 t | Cambodia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop harvest removal β cropland nitrogen, Cambodia or Czechia?
- Cambodia, at 235,659 t against 218,617 t in Czechia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop harvest removal β cropland nitrogen between Cambodia and Czechia?
- 17,042 t, with Cambodia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cambodia and Czechia?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Cambodia and Czechia rank globally for crop harvest removal β cropland nitrogen?
- Cambodia ranks 45th and Czechia ranks 48th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop harvest removal β Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).