Cameroon vs Czechia: Crop harvest removal β€” Cropland nitrogen

Cameroon
212,165 t
in 2023
Czechia
218,617 t
in 2023
Cameroon rank
57th
Czechia rank
55th

Crop harvest removal β€” Cropland nitrogen over time

  • Cameroon
  • Czechia
50.0k100.0k150.0k200.0k250.0k196119922023

How they compare

Czechia currently reports 218,617 t against 212,165 t in Cameroon, a difference of 6,452 t.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Czechia ahead.

Cameroon ranks 57th and Czechia ranks 55th of 201 countries.

Czechia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cameroon Czechia Difference Ahead
1990s 74,138 t 174,278 t 100,140 t Czechia
2000s 109,593 t 185,916 t 76,323 t Czechia
2010s 184,001 t 205,703 t 21,702 t Czechia
2020s 210,051 t 215,624 t 5,572 t Czechia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher crop harvest removal β€” cropland nitrogen, Cameroon or Czechia?
Czechia, at 218,617 t against 212,165 t in Cameroon as of 2023.
What is the difference in crop harvest removal β€” cropland nitrogen between Cameroon and Czechia?
6,452 t, with Czechia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cameroon and Czechia?
31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
How do Cameroon and Czechia rank globally for crop harvest removal β€” cropland nitrogen?
Cameroon ranks 57th and Czechia ranks 55th of 201 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop harvest removal β€” Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Crop harvest removal β€” Cropland nitrogen
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,483 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).