Caribbean vs Mali: Crop harvest removal — Cropland nitrogen
Crop harvest removal — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Caribbean
- Mali
How they compare
Caribbean currently reports 291,191 t against 254,613 t in Mali, a difference of 36,578 t.
That makes Caribbean's figure about 1.1 times Mali's.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Caribbean has been ahead every year.
Caribbean ranks 42nd and Mali ranks 45th of 201 countries.
Caribbean has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Caribbean | Mali | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 325,437 t | 27,645 t | 297,793 t | Caribbean |
| 1970s | 378,505 t | 33,699 t | 344,806 t | Caribbean |
| 1980s | 406,509 t | 46,799 t | 359,710 t | Caribbean |
| 1990s | 309,287 t | 76,841 t | 232,447 t | Caribbean |
| 2000s | 249,697 t | 104,965 t | 144,732 t | Caribbean |
| 2010s | 267,280 t | 200,688 t | 66,592 t | Caribbean |
| 2020s | 273,844 t | 237,636 t | 36,208 t | Caribbean |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop harvest removal — cropland nitrogen, Caribbean or Mali?
- Caribbean, at 291,191 t against 254,613 t in Mali as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop harvest removal — cropland nitrogen between Caribbean and Mali?
- 36,578 t, with Caribbean ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Caribbean and Mali?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Caribbean and Mali rank globally for crop harvest removal — cropland nitrogen?
- Caribbean ranks 42nd and Mali ranks 45th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop harvest removal — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).