Côte d'Ivoire vs Kazakhstan: Crop harvest removal — Cropland nitrogen
Crop harvest removal — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Côte d'Ivoire
- Kazakhstan
How they compare
Kazakhstan currently reports 468,680 t against 264,375 t in Côte d'Ivoire, a difference of 204,305 t.
That makes Kazakhstan's figure about 1.8 times Côte d'Ivoire's.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Kazakhstan has been ahead every year.
Côte d'Ivoire ranks 28th and Kazakhstan ranks 29th of 29 groups.
Kazakhstan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Côte d'Ivoire | Kazakhstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 110,606 t | 327,108 t | 216,503 t | Kazakhstan |
| 2000s | 130,825 t | 365,803 t | 234,977 t | Kazakhstan |
| 2010s | 189,074 t | 470,664 t | 281,590 t | Kazakhstan |
| 2020s | 250,834 t | 511,580 t | 260,746 t | Kazakhstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop harvest removal — cropland nitrogen, Côte d'Ivoire or Kazakhstan?
- Kazakhstan, at 468,680 t against 264,375 t in Côte d'Ivoire as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop harvest removal — cropland nitrogen between Côte d'Ivoire and Kazakhstan?
- 204,305 t, with Kazakhstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Côte d'Ivoire and Kazakhstan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Côte d'Ivoire and Kazakhstan rank globally for crop harvest removal — cropland nitrogen?
- Côte d'Ivoire ranks 28th and Kazakhstan ranks 29th of 29 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop harvest removal — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).