Côte d'Ivoire vs Mali: Crop harvest removal — Cropland nitrogen
Crop harvest removal — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Côte d'Ivoire
- Mali
How they compare
Côte d'Ivoire currently reports 264,375 t against 254,613 t in Mali, a difference of 9,762 t.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Mali ahead.
Côte d'Ivoire ranks 28th and Mali ranks 38th of 29 groups.
Across the 7 decades both report, Côte d'Ivoire averaged higher in 6 and Mali in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Côte d'Ivoire | Mali | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 29,517 t | 27,645 t | 1,873 t | Côte d'Ivoire |
| 1970s | 48,633 t | 33,699 t | 14,934 t | Côte d'Ivoire |
| 1980s | 81,604 t | 46,799 t | 34,805 t | Côte d'Ivoire |
| 1990s | 108,277 t | 76,841 t | 31,436 t | Côte d'Ivoire |
| 2000s | 130,825 t | 104,965 t | 25,860 t | Côte d'Ivoire |
| 2010s | 189,074 t | 200,688 t | 11,614 t | Mali |
| 2020s | 250,834 t | 237,636 t | 13,198 t | Côte d'Ivoire |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop harvest removal — cropland nitrogen, Côte d'Ivoire or Mali?
- Côte d'Ivoire, at 264,375 t against 254,613 t in Mali as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop harvest removal — cropland nitrogen between Côte d'Ivoire and Mali?
- 9,762 t, with Côte d'Ivoire ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Côte d'Ivoire and Mali?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Côte d'Ivoire and Mali rank globally for crop harvest removal — cropland nitrogen?
- Côte d'Ivoire ranks 28th and Mali ranks 38th of 29 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop harvest removal — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).