Estonia vs Portugal: Crop harvest removal — Cropland nitrogen
Crop harvest removal — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Estonia
- Portugal
How they compare
Portugal currently reports 37,252 t against 32,986 t in Estonia, a difference of 4,266 t.
That makes Portugal's figure about 1.1 times Estonia's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Portugal ahead.
Estonia ranks 110th and Portugal ranks 108th of 186 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Estonia averaged higher in 1 and Portugal in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Estonia | Portugal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 13,498 t | 44,463 t | 30,965 t | Portugal |
| 2000s | 17,068 t | 37,577 t | 20,509 t | Portugal |
| 2010s | 29,190 t | 33,921 t | 4,731 t | Portugal |
| 2020s | 38,495 t | 36,308 t | 2,186 t | Estonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop harvest removal — cropland nitrogen, Estonia or Portugal?
- Portugal, at 37,252 t against 32,986 t in Estonia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop harvest removal — cropland nitrogen between Estonia and Portugal?
- 4,266 t, with Portugal ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and Portugal?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Estonia and Portugal rank globally for crop harvest removal — cropland nitrogen?
- Estonia ranks 110th and Portugal ranks 108th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop harvest removal — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).