Ethiopia vs Paraguay: Crop harvest removal — Cropland nitrogen
Crop harvest removal — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Ethiopia
- Paraguay
How they compare
Paraguay currently reports 714,164 t against 670,504 t in Ethiopia, a difference of 43,660 t.
That makes Paraguay's figure about 1.1 times Ethiopia's.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Paraguay ahead.
Ethiopia ranks 24th and Paraguay ranks 22nd of 186 countries.
Paraguay has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ethiopia | Paraguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 168,631 t | 197,485 t | 28,855 t | Paraguay |
| 2000s | 271,631 t | 312,625 t | 40,994 t | Paraguay |
| 2010s | 548,549 t | 623,091 t | 74,542 t | Paraguay |
| 2020s | 656,948 t | 660,964 t | 4,016 t | Paraguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop harvest removal — cropland nitrogen, Ethiopia or Paraguay?
- Paraguay, at 714,164 t against 670,504 t in Ethiopia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop harvest removal — cropland nitrogen between Ethiopia and Paraguay?
- 43,660 t, with Paraguay ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ethiopia and Paraguay?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Ethiopia and Paraguay rank globally for crop harvest removal — cropland nitrogen?
- Ethiopia ranks 24th and Paraguay ranks 22nd of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop harvest removal — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).