Grenada vs Iceland: Crop harvest removal — Cropland nitrogen
Crop harvest removal — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Grenada
- Iceland
How they compare
Grenada currently reports 282.11 t against 171.25 t in Iceland, a difference of 110.86 t.
That makes Grenada's figure about 1.6 times Iceland's.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Grenada has been ahead every year.
Grenada ranks 186th and Iceland ranks 189th of 201 countries.
Grenada has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Grenada | Iceland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 377.51 t | 24.13 t | 353.38 t | Grenada |
| 1970s | 354.62 t | 25.33 t | 329.29 t | Grenada |
| 1980s | 344.93 t | 38.89 t | 306.04 t | Grenada |
| 1990s | 326.51 t | 36.26 t | 290.25 t | Grenada |
| 2000s | 262.84 t | 43.47 t | 219.36 t | Grenada |
| 2010s | 303.55 t | 93.65 t | 209.9 t | Grenada |
| 2020s | 280.21 t | 173.48 t | 106.73 t | Grenada |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop harvest removal — cropland nitrogen, Grenada or Iceland?
- Grenada, at 282.11 t against 171.25 t in Iceland as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop harvest removal — cropland nitrogen between Grenada and Iceland?
- 110.86 t, with Grenada ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Grenada and Iceland?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Grenada and Iceland rank globally for crop harvest removal — cropland nitrogen?
- Grenada ranks 186th and Iceland ranks 189th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop harvest removal — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).