Guinea-Bissau vs Norway: Crop harvest removal — Cropland nitrogen
Crop harvest removal — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Guinea-Bissau
- Norway
How they compare
Norway currently reports 17,167 t against 14,567 t in Guinea-Bissau, a difference of 2,600 t.
That makes Norway's figure about 1.2 times Guinea-Bissau's.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Norway has been ahead every year.
Guinea-Bissau ranks 122nd and Norway ranks 120th of 186 countries.
Norway has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guinea-Bissau | Norway | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 4,027 t | 15,343 t | 11,316 t | Norway |
| 1970s | 3,603 t | 21,082 t | 17,479 t | Norway |
| 1980s | 4,946 t | 26,011 t | 21,066 t | Norway |
| 1990s | 5,691 t | 27,682 t | 21,991 t | Norway |
| 2000s | 7,816 t | 26,727 t | 18,911 t | Norway |
| 2010s | 10,480 t | 24,588 t | 14,108 t | Norway |
| 2020s | 13,893 t | 24,586 t | 10,693 t | Norway |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop harvest removal — cropland nitrogen, Guinea-Bissau or Norway?
- Norway, at 17,167 t against 14,567 t in Guinea-Bissau as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop harvest removal — cropland nitrogen between Guinea-Bissau and Norway?
- 2,600 t, with Norway ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea-Bissau and Norway?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Guinea-Bissau and Norway rank globally for crop harvest removal — cropland nitrogen?
- Guinea-Bissau ranks 122nd and Norway ranks 120th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop harvest removal — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).