Guinea vs Sri Lanka: Crop harvest removal β Cropland nitrogen
Crop harvest removal β Cropland nitrogen over time
- Guinea
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Guinea currently reports 141,104 t against 138,366 t in Sri Lanka, a difference of 2,738 t.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Sri Lanka ahead.
Guinea ranks 66th and Sri Lanka ranks 67th of 185 countries.
Sri Lanka has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guinea | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 18,383 t | 55,009 t | 36,626 t | Sri Lanka |
| 1970s | 21,447 t | 61,426 t | 39,979 t | Sri Lanka |
| 1980s | 26,110 t | 76,061 t | 49,951 t | Sri Lanka |
| 1990s | 38,855 t | 94,054 t | 55,199 t | Sri Lanka |
| 2000s | 59,058 t | 109,872 t | 50,814 t | Sri Lanka |
| 2010s | 87,020 t | 136,038 t | 49,017 t | Sri Lanka |
| 2020s | 128,780 t | 146,374 t | 17,594 t | Sri Lanka |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop harvest removal β cropland nitrogen, Guinea or Sri Lanka?
- Guinea, at 141,104 t against 138,366 t in Sri Lanka as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop harvest removal β cropland nitrogen between Guinea and Sri Lanka?
- 2,738 t, with Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea and Sri Lanka?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Guinea and Sri Lanka rank globally for crop harvest removal β cropland nitrogen?
- Guinea ranks 66th and Sri Lanka ranks 67th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop harvest removal β Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).