Iceland vs Malta: Crop harvest removal — Cropland nitrogen
Crop harvest removal — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Iceland
- Malta
How they compare
Iceland currently reports 171.25 t against 162.19 t in Malta, a difference of 9.06 t.
That makes Iceland's figure about 1.1 times Malta's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Malta ahead.
Iceland ranks 189th and Malta ranks 190th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Iceland averaged higher in 1 and Malta in 6.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iceland | Malta | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 24.13 t | 405.93 t | 381.8 t | Malta |
| 1970s | 25.33 t | 376.76 t | 351.44 t | Malta |
| 1980s | 38.89 t | 485.2 t | 446.31 t | Malta |
| 1990s | 36.26 t | 566.12 t | 529.86 t | Malta |
| 2000s | 43.47 t | 721.33 t | 677.85 t | Malta |
| 2010s | 93.65 t | 628.12 t | 534.47 t | Malta |
| 2020s | 173.48 t | 166.87 t | 6.61 t | Iceland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop harvest removal — cropland nitrogen, Iceland or Malta?
- Iceland, at 171.25 t against 162.19 t in Malta as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop harvest removal — cropland nitrogen between Iceland and Malta?
- 9.06 t, with Iceland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Malta?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Iceland and Malta rank globally for crop harvest removal — cropland nitrogen?
- Iceland ranks 189th and Malta ranks 190th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop harvest removal — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).