Italy vs Uzbekistan: Crop harvest removal — Cropland nitrogen
Crop harvest removal — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Italy
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Uzbekistan currently reports 434,006 t against 431,487 t in Italy, a difference of 2,519 t.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Italy ahead.
Italy ranks 31st and Uzbekistan ranks 30th of 186 countries.
Italy has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Italy | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 558,517 t | 302,384 t | 256,133 t | Italy |
| 2000s | 520,218 t | 341,890 t | 178,327 t | Italy |
| 2010s | 470,919 t | 382,340 t | 88,579 t | Italy |
| 2020s | 433,657 t | 407,987 t | 25,670 t | Italy |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop harvest removal — cropland nitrogen, Italy or Uzbekistan?
- Uzbekistan, at 434,006 t against 431,487 t in Italy as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop harvest removal — cropland nitrogen between Italy and Uzbekistan?
- 2,519 t, with Uzbekistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Italy and Uzbekistan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Italy and Uzbekistan rank globally for crop harvest removal — cropland nitrogen?
- Italy ranks 31st and Uzbekistan ranks 30th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop harvest removal — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).