Japan vs Serbia: Crop harvest removal — Cropland nitrogen
Crop harvest removal — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Japan
- Serbia
How they compare
Japan currently reports 245,508 t against 236,773 t in Serbia, a difference of 8,735 t.
Across all 18 years both countries report, Japan has been ahead every year.
Japan ranks 41st and Serbia ranks 44th of 186 countries.
Japan has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Japan | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 264,202 t | 172,321 t | 91,881 t | Japan |
| 2010s | 253,895 t | 198,368 t | 55,527 t | Japan |
| 2020s | 249,476 t | 222,919 t | 26,557 t | Japan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop harvest removal — cropland nitrogen, Japan or Serbia?
- Japan, at 245,508 t against 236,773 t in Serbia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop harvest removal — cropland nitrogen between Japan and Serbia?
- 8,735 t, with Japan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Japan and Serbia?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
- How do Japan and Serbia rank globally for crop harvest removal — cropland nitrogen?
- Japan ranks 41st and Serbia ranks 44th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop harvest removal — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).