Kiribati vs Lesotho: Crop harvest removal — Cropland nitrogen
Crop harvest removal — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Kiribati
- Lesotho
How they compare
Kiribati currently reports 2,968 t against 2,651 t in Lesotho, a difference of 317 t.
That makes Kiribati's figure about 1.1 times Lesotho's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Lesotho ahead.
Kiribati ranks 161st and Lesotho ranks 162nd of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Kiribati averaged higher in 2 and Lesotho in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kiribati | Lesotho | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 998.71 t | 3,746 t | 2,747 t | Lesotho |
| 1970s | 1,067 t | 3,607 t | 2,540 t | Lesotho |
| 1980s | 1,493 t | 2,781 t | 1,288 t | Lesotho |
| 1990s | 1,394 t | 2,975 t | 1,581 t | Lesotho |
| 2000s | 2,041 t | 2,404 t | 363.12 t | Lesotho |
| 2010s | 2,917 t | 2,262 t | 654.26 t | Kiribati |
| 2020s | 2,821 t | 2,016 t | 805.7 t | Kiribati |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop harvest removal — cropland nitrogen, Kiribati or Lesotho?
- Kiribati, at 2,968 t against 2,651 t in Lesotho as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop harvest removal — cropland nitrogen between Kiribati and Lesotho?
- 317 t, with Kiribati ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Lesotho?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Kiribati and Lesotho rank globally for crop harvest removal — cropland nitrogen?
- Kiribati ranks 161st and Lesotho ranks 162nd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop harvest removal — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).