Kyrgyzstan vs Tunisia: Crop harvest removal — Cropland nitrogen
Crop harvest removal — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Kyrgyzstan
- Tunisia
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 45,988 t against 41,238 t in Tunisia, a difference of 4,750 t.
That makes Kyrgyzstan's figure about 1.1 times Tunisia's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Tunisia ahead.
Kyrgyzstan ranks 102nd and Tunisia ranks 104th of 186 countries.
Tunisia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kyrgyzstan | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 36,504 t | 50,429 t | 13,925 t | Tunisia |
| 2000s | 47,008 t | 53,926 t | 6,918 t | Tunisia |
| 2010s | 46,706 t | 61,723 t | 15,018 t | Tunisia |
| 2020s | 47,604 t | 58,416 t | 10,812 t | Tunisia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop harvest removal — cropland nitrogen, Kyrgyzstan or Tunisia?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 45,988 t against 41,238 t in Tunisia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop harvest removal — cropland nitrogen between Kyrgyzstan and Tunisia?
- 4,750 t, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Tunisia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Kyrgyzstan and Tunisia rank globally for crop harvest removal — cropland nitrogen?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 102nd and Tunisia ranks 104th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop harvest removal — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).