Malawi vs Sudan (former): Crop harvest removal — Cropland nitrogen
Crop harvest removal — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Malawi
- Sudan (former)
How they compare
Malawi currently reports 204,071 t against 195,227 t in Sudan (former), a difference of 8,844 t.
Across all 51 years both countries report, Sudan (former) has been ahead every year.
Malawi ranks 53rd and Sudan (former) ranks 55th of 185 countries.
Sudan (former) has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malawi | Sudan (former) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 27,189 t | 80,358 t | 53,169 t | Sudan (former) |
| 1970s | 38,556 t | 117,645 t | 79,089 t | Sudan (former) |
| 1980s | 44,791 t | 119,233 t | 74,441 t | Sudan (former) |
| 1990s | 54,335 t | 141,558 t | 87,223 t | Sudan (former) |
| 2000s | 88,801 t | 181,011 t | 92,210 t | Sudan (former) |
| 2010s | 129,174 t | 170,593 t | 41,420 t | Sudan (former) |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop harvest removal — cropland nitrogen, Malawi or Sudan (former)?
- Malawi, at 204,071 t against 195,227 t in Sudan (former) as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop harvest removal — cropland nitrogen between Malawi and Sudan (former)?
- 8,844 t, with Malawi ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Sudan (former)?
- 51 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2011.
- How do Malawi and Sudan (former) rank globally for crop harvest removal — cropland nitrogen?
- Malawi ranks 53rd and Sudan (former) ranks 55th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop harvest removal — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).