Maldives vs Malta: Crop harvest removal — Cropland nitrogen
Crop harvest removal — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Maldives
- Malta
How they compare
Malta currently reports 162.19 t against 113.31 t in Maldives, a difference of 48.88 t.
That makes Malta's figure about 1.4 times Maldives's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Malta ahead.
Maldives ranks 192nd and Malta ranks 190th of 201 countries.
Malta has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Maldives | Malta | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 220.28 t | 405.93 t | 185.65 t | Malta |
| 1970s | 235.85 t | 376.76 t | 140.91 t | Malta |
| 1980s | 316.79 t | 485.2 t | 168.41 t | Malta |
| 1990s | 252.06 t | 566.12 t | 314.05 t | Malta |
| 2000s | 352.89 t | 721.33 t | 368.44 t | Malta |
| 2010s | 168.79 t | 628.12 t | 459.33 t | Malta |
| 2020s | 140.83 t | 166.87 t | 26.04 t | Malta |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop harvest removal — cropland nitrogen, Maldives or Malta?
- Malta, at 162.19 t against 113.31 t in Maldives as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop harvest removal — cropland nitrogen between Maldives and Malta?
- 48.88 t, with Malta ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Maldives and Malta?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Maldives and Malta rank globally for crop harvest removal — cropland nitrogen?
- Maldives ranks 192nd and Malta ranks 190th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop harvest removal — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).