Malta vs Seychelles: Crop harvest removal — Cropland nitrogen
Crop harvest removal — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Malta
- Seychelles
How they compare
Malta currently reports 162.19 t against 110.26 t in Seychelles, a difference of 51.93 t.
That makes Malta's figure about 1.5 times Seychelles's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Seychelles ahead.
Malta ranks 190th and Seychelles ranks 193rd of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Malta averaged higher in 6 and Seychelles in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malta | Seychelles | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 405.93 t | 566.21 t | 160.28 t | Seychelles |
| 1970s | 376.76 t | 345.4 t | 31.36 t | Malta |
| 1980s | 485.2 t | 249.65 t | 235.55 t | Malta |
| 1990s | 566.12 t | 92.45 t | 473.67 t | Malta |
| 2000s | 721.33 t | 88.13 t | 633.2 t | Malta |
| 2010s | 628.12 t | 87.75 t | 540.37 t | Malta |
| 2020s | 166.87 t | 103.94 t | 62.93 t | Malta |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop harvest removal — cropland nitrogen, Malta or Seychelles?
- Malta, at 162.19 t against 110.26 t in Seychelles as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop harvest removal — cropland nitrogen between Malta and Seychelles?
- 51.93 t, with Malta ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Seychelles?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Malta and Seychelles rank globally for crop harvest removal — cropland nitrogen?
- Malta ranks 190th and Seychelles ranks 193rd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop harvest removal — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).