Mexico vs Thailand: Crop harvest removal — Cropland nitrogen
Crop harvest removal — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Mexico
- Thailand
How they compare
Thailand currently reports 1.09 million t against 1.04 million t in Mexico, a difference of 51,030 t.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Mexico ahead.
Mexico ranks 18th and Thailand ranks 16th of 185 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Mexico averaged higher in 5 and Thailand in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mexico | Thailand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 449,545 t | 229,752 t | 219,793 t | Mexico |
| 1970s | 559,938 t | 350,956 t | 208,981 t | Mexico |
| 1980s | 718,768 t | 531,997 t | 186,771 t | Mexico |
| 1990s | 769,154 t | 668,424 t | 100,731 t | Mexico |
| 2000s | 868,783 t | 872,433 t | 3,650 t | Thailand |
| 2010s | 999,998 t | 1.10 million t | 98,776 t | Thailand |
| 2020s | 1.05 million t | 1.05 million t | 3,729 t | Mexico |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop harvest removal — cropland nitrogen, Mexico or Thailand?
- Thailand, at 1.09 million t against 1.04 million t in Mexico as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop harvest removal — cropland nitrogen between Mexico and Thailand?
- 51,030 t, with Thailand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mexico and Thailand?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Mexico and Thailand rank globally for crop harvest removal — cropland nitrogen?
- Mexico ranks 18th and Thailand ranks 16th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop harvest removal — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).