Myanmar vs Paraguay: Crop harvest removal β Cropland nitrogen
Crop harvest removal β Cropland nitrogen over time
- Myanmar
- Paraguay
How they compare
Paraguay currently reports 714,164 t against 712,892 t in Myanmar, a difference of 1,272 t.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Myanmar ahead.
Myanmar ranks 23rd and Paraguay ranks 22nd of 185 countries.
Myanmar has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Myanmar | Paraguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 139,821 t | 19,687 t | 120,134 t | Myanmar |
| 1970s | 165,020 t | 46,873 t | 118,147 t | Myanmar |
| 1980s | 264,165 t | 116,873 t | 147,293 t | Myanmar |
| 1990s | 333,327 t | 182,051 t | 151,276 t | Myanmar |
| 2000s | 641,777 t | 312,625 t | 329,152 t | Myanmar |
| 2010s | 773,551 t | 623,091 t | 150,460 t | Myanmar |
| 2020s | 724,051 t | 660,964 t | 63,088 t | Myanmar |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop harvest removal β cropland nitrogen, Myanmar or Paraguay?
- Paraguay, at 714,164 t against 712,892 t in Myanmar as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop harvest removal β cropland nitrogen between Myanmar and Paraguay?
- 1,272 t, with Paraguay ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Myanmar and Paraguay?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Myanmar and Paraguay rank globally for crop harvest removal β cropland nitrogen?
- Myanmar ranks 23rd and Paraguay ranks 22nd of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop harvest removal β Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).