Nepal vs Serbia: Crop harvest removal — Cropland nitrogen
Crop harvest removal — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Nepal
- Serbia
How they compare
Nepal currently reports 243,056 t against 236,773 t in Serbia, a difference of 6,283 t.
The two have swapped places 11 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Serbia ahead.
Nepal ranks 42nd and Serbia ranks 44th of 185 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Nepal averaged higher in 2 and Serbia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nepal | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 165,378 t | 172,321 t | 6,942 t | Serbia |
| 2010s | 207,298 t | 198,368 t | 8,931 t | Nepal |
| 2020s | 241,447 t | 222,919 t | 18,528 t | Nepal |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop harvest removal — cropland nitrogen, Nepal or Serbia?
- Nepal, at 243,056 t against 236,773 t in Serbia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop harvest removal — cropland nitrogen between Nepal and Serbia?
- 6,283 t, with Nepal ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nepal and Serbia?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
- How do Nepal and Serbia rank globally for crop harvest removal — cropland nitrogen?
- Nepal ranks 42nd and Serbia ranks 44th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop harvest removal — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).