Puerto Rico vs Samoa: Crop harvest removal — Cropland nitrogen
Crop harvest removal — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Puerto Rico
- Samoa
How they compare
Puerto Rico currently reports 1,628 t against 1,519 t in Samoa, a difference of 109 t.
That makes Puerto Rico's figure about 1.1 times Samoa's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Puerto Rico ahead.
Puerto Rico ranks 155th and Samoa ranks 156th of 185 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Puerto Rico averaged higher in 5 and Samoa in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Puerto Rico | Samoa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 31,619 t | 2,692 t | 28,927 t | Puerto Rico |
| 1970s | 14,155 t | 3,260 t | 10,895 t | Puerto Rico |
| 1980s | 6,710 t | 3,613 t | 3,096 t | Puerto Rico |
| 1990s | 3,217 t | 2,611 t | 605.56 t | Puerto Rico |
| 2000s | 1,498 t | 2,814 t | 1,316 t | Samoa |
| 2010s | 1,518 t | 2,318 t | 800.21 t | Samoa |
| 2020s | 1,604 t | 1,518 t | 85.75 t | Puerto Rico |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop harvest removal — cropland nitrogen, Puerto Rico or Samoa?
- Puerto Rico, at 1,628 t against 1,519 t in Samoa as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop harvest removal — cropland nitrogen between Puerto Rico and Samoa?
- 109 t, with Puerto Rico ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Puerto Rico and Samoa?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Puerto Rico and Samoa rank globally for crop harvest removal — cropland nitrogen?
- Puerto Rico ranks 155th and Samoa ranks 156th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop harvest removal — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).