Syrian Arab Republic vs United Republic of Tanzania: Crop harvest removal — Cropland nitrogen

Syrian Arab Republic
129,202 t
in 2023
United Republic of Tanzania
412,281 t
in 2023
Syrian Arab Republic rank
11th
United Republic of Tanzania rank
8th

Crop harvest removal — Cropland nitrogen over time

  • Syrian Arab Republic
  • United Republic of Tanzania
0100.0k200.0k300.0k400.0k196119922023

How they compare

United Republic of Tanzania currently reports 412,281 t against 129,202 t in Syrian Arab Republic, a difference of 283,079 t.

That makes United Republic of Tanzania's figure about 3.2 times Syrian Arab Republic's.

The two have swapped places 18 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was United Republic of Tanzania ahead.

Syrian Arab Republic ranks 11th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 8th of 18 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Syrian Arab Republic averaged higher in 2 and United Republic of Tanzania in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Syrian Arab Republic United Republic of Tanzania Difference Ahead
1960s 64,814 t 60,865 t 3,948 t Syrian Arab Republic
1970s 75,480 t 86,083 t 10,604 t United Republic of Tanzania
1980s 103,480 t 119,315 t 15,835 t United Republic of Tanzania
1990s 160,709 t 140,577 t 20,132 t Syrian Arab Republic
2000s 188,667 t 203,267 t 14,600 t United Republic of Tanzania
2010s 122,717 t 362,326 t 239,609 t United Republic of Tanzania
2020s 107,952 t 404,159 t 296,207 t United Republic of Tanzania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher crop harvest removal — cropland nitrogen, Syrian Arab Republic or United Republic of Tanzania?
United Republic of Tanzania, at 412,281 t against 129,202 t in Syrian Arab Republic as of 2023.
What is the difference in crop harvest removal — cropland nitrogen between Syrian Arab Republic and United Republic of Tanzania?
283,079 t, with United Republic of Tanzania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Syrian Arab Republic and United Republic of Tanzania?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Syrian Arab Republic and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for crop harvest removal — cropland nitrogen?
Syrian Arab Republic ranks 11th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 8th of 18 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop harvest removal — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Syrian Arab Republic vs United Republic of Tanzania: Crop harvest removal — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/crop-harvest-removal-cropland-nitrogen/syrian-arab-republic-2/united-republic-of-tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/crop-harvest-removal-cropland-nitrogen/syrian-arab-republic-2/united-republic-of-tanzania/">Syrian Arab Republic vs United Republic of Tanzania: Crop harvest removal — Cropland nitrogen</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Crop harvest removal — Cropland nitrogen
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,483 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).