Syrian Arab Republic vs United States of America: Crop harvest removal — Cropland nitrogen

Syrian Arab Republic
129,202 t
in 2023
United States of America
13.77 million t
in 2023
Syrian Arab Republic rank
11th
United States of America rank
8th

Crop harvest removal — Cropland nitrogen over time

  • Syrian Arab Republic
  • United States of America
05.0M10.0M15.0M196119922023

How they compare

United States of America currently reports 13.77 million t against 129,202 t in Syrian Arab Republic, a difference of 13.65 million t.

That makes United States of America's figure about 106.6 times Syrian Arab Republic's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, United States of America has been ahead every year.

Syrian Arab Republic ranks 11th and United States of America ranks 8th of 18 countries.

United States of America has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Syrian Arab Republic United States of America Difference Ahead
1960s 64,814 t 4.95 million t 4.89 million t United States of America
1970s 75,480 t 6.83 million t 6.75 million t United States of America
1980s 103,480 t 8.13 million t 8.03 million t United States of America
1990s 160,709 t 9.34 million t 9.18 million t United States of America
2000s 188,667 t 10.79 million t 10.61 million t United States of America
2010s 122,717 t 12.83 million t 12.70 million t United States of America
2020s 107,952 t 13.70 million t 13.60 million t United States of America

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher crop harvest removal — cropland nitrogen, Syrian Arab Republic or United States of America?
United States of America, at 13.77 million t against 129,202 t in Syrian Arab Republic as of 2023.
What is the difference in crop harvest removal — cropland nitrogen between Syrian Arab Republic and United States of America?
13.65 million t, with United States of America ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Syrian Arab Republic and United States of America?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Syrian Arab Republic and United States of America rank globally for crop harvest removal — cropland nitrogen?
Syrian Arab Republic ranks 11th and United States of America ranks 8th of 18 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop harvest removal — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Syrian Arab Republic vs United States of America: Crop harvest removal — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/crop-harvest-removal-cropland-nitrogen/syrian-arab-republic-2/united-states-of-america/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/crop-harvest-removal-cropland-nitrogen/syrian-arab-republic-2/united-states-of-america/">Syrian Arab Republic vs United States of America: Crop harvest removal — Cropland nitrogen</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Crop harvest removal — Cropland nitrogen
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,483 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).