Argentina vs Latvia: Crop harvest removal — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Crop harvest removal — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time
- Argentina
- Latvia
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 10.09 kg/ha against 9.98 kg/ha in Argentina, a difference of 0.11 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Argentina ahead.
Argentina ranks 65th and Latvia ranks 63rd of 186 countries.
Argentina has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Argentina | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 8.34 kg/ha | 3.71 kg/ha | 4.63 kg/ha | Argentina |
| 2000s | 11.59 kg/ha | 5.6 kg/ha | 5.99 kg/ha | Argentina |
| 2010s | 13.84 kg/ha | 9.06 kg/ha | 4.79 kg/ha | Argentina |
| 2020s | 13.39 kg/ha | 11.38 kg/ha | 2.01 kg/ha | Argentina |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop harvest removal — cropland phosphorus per unit area, Argentina or Latvia?
- Latvia, at 10.09 kg/ha against 9.98 kg/ha in Argentina as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop harvest removal — cropland phosphorus per unit area between Argentina and Latvia?
- 0.11 kg/ha, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Latvia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Argentina and Latvia rank globally for crop harvest removal — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
- Argentina ranks 65th and Latvia ranks 63rd of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop harvest removal — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).