Armenia vs Nicaragua: Crop harvest removal — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Crop harvest removal — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time
- Armenia
- Nicaragua
How they compare
Nicaragua currently reports 4.43 kg/ha against 4.29 kg/ha in Armenia, a difference of 0.14 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Armenia ahead.
Armenia ranks 138th and Nicaragua ranks 135th of 186 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Armenia averaged higher in 3 and Nicaragua in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Nicaragua | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 3.53 kg/ha | 2.36 kg/ha | 1.17 kg/ha | Armenia |
| 2000s | 4.66 kg/ha | 2.87 kg/ha | 1.79 kg/ha | Armenia |
| 2010s | 5.85 kg/ha | 4.18 kg/ha | 1.67 kg/ha | Armenia |
| 2020s | 3.85 kg/ha | 4.65 kg/ha | 0.796 kg/ha | Nicaragua |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop harvest removal — cropland phosphorus per unit area, Armenia or Nicaragua?
- Nicaragua, at 4.43 kg/ha against 4.29 kg/ha in Armenia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop harvest removal — cropland phosphorus per unit area between Armenia and Nicaragua?
- 0.14 kg/ha, with Nicaragua ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Nicaragua?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Armenia and Nicaragua rank globally for crop harvest removal — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
- Armenia ranks 138th and Nicaragua ranks 135th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop harvest removal — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).