Armenia vs Puerto Rico: Crop harvest removal — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Crop harvest removal — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time
- Armenia
- Puerto Rico
How they compare
Puerto Rico currently reports 4.32 kg/ha against 4.29 kg/ha in Armenia, a difference of 0.03 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Puerto Rico ahead.
Armenia ranks 138th and Puerto Rico ranks 136th of 186 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Armenia averaged higher in 2 and Puerto Rico in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Puerto Rico | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 3.53 kg/ha | 3.97 kg/ha | 0.438 kg/ha | Puerto Rico |
| 2000s | 4.66 kg/ha | 2.91 kg/ha | 1.75 kg/ha | Armenia |
| 2010s | 5.85 kg/ha | 3.56 kg/ha | 2.29 kg/ha | Armenia |
| 2020s | 3.85 kg/ha | 4.2 kg/ha | 0.3504 kg/ha | Puerto Rico |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop harvest removal — cropland phosphorus per unit area, Armenia or Puerto Rico?
- Puerto Rico, at 4.32 kg/ha against 4.29 kg/ha in Armenia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop harvest removal — cropland phosphorus per unit area between Armenia and Puerto Rico?
- 0.03 kg/ha, with Puerto Rico ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Puerto Rico?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Armenia and Puerto Rico rank globally for crop harvest removal — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
- Armenia ranks 138th and Puerto Rico ranks 136th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop harvest removal — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).